People v. Peterkin

5 A.D.3d 751, 773 N.Y.S.2d 567, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3616
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 29, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from (1) an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), dated March 28, 2003, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender, and (2) so much of an order of the same court entered May 1, 2003, as, upon renewal, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 28, 2003, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order entered May 1, 2003, made upon renewal; and it is further,

[752]*752Ordered that the order entered May 1, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The People presented clear and convincing evidence sufficient to support the County Court’s determination designating the defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189 [2001] ). Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peterkin, 5 A.D.3d 751, 773 N.Y.S.2d 567, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 751 (People v. Peterkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hargrove
31 A.D.3d 408 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)