People v. Peterkin

23 A.D.3d 678, 804 N.Y.S.2d 269
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 28, 2005·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered August 25, 2003, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a [679]*679weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended sentence of the sainé court imposed November 13, 2003.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended sentence are affirmed.

The defendant’s contention concerning the trial court’s charge on the issue of justification is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to review this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v Holmes, 12 AD3d 532 [2004]; cf. People v Feuer, 11 AD3d 633 [2004]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Luciano, J.P., Crane, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peterkin, 23 A.D.3d 678, 804 N.Y.S.2d 269 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

23 A.D.3d 678 (People v. Peterkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simpson v. Bell
E.D. New York, 2021
People v. Fitzgerald
120 A.D.3d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Wright
90 A.D.3d 679 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Gueye
81 A.D.3d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Dawyne
71 A.D.3d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Ware
36 A.D.3d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Palmer
34 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Soto
31 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)