People v. Perez

309 A.D.2d 522, 765 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10353
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 277 A.D.2d 1

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James Yates, J.), rendered December 13, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 25 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s challenges for cause to four prospective jurors. As to each panelist, the court conducted a thorough inquiry and all four stated unequivocally that they could be fair and impartial (see People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]).

The jury’s verdict rejecting defendant’s insanity defense was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning the evaluation of conflicting expert testimony. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 309 A.D.2d 522, 765 N.Y.S.2d 497, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

309 A.D.2d 522 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Chambers
766 N.E.2d 953 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)