People v. Perez

276 A.D.2d 722, 715 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10654
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 23, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), rendered April 29, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not err in admitting into evidence a photocopy of his written statement to law enforcement officials. The People sufficiently established that the original written statement was missing, that a diligent search was made to recover the lost spiral notebook containing the statement, and that the copy was a duplicate of the original (see, Schozer v William Penn Life Ins. Co., 84 NY2d 639; People v Sims, 257 AD2d 582).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 276 A.D.2d 722, 715 N.Y.S.2d 858, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 722 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Russillo
286 A.D.2d 992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)