People v. Perez

245 A.D.2d 93, 665 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12901
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 A.D.2d 351

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Martin Marcus, J., on omnibus motion; John Stackhouse, J., on renewed suppression motions and at plea and sentence), rendered May 22, 1996, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record indicates that a suppression hearing, which would have included review of the issue of probable cause, was granted in this case. However, defendant entered a knowing, intelligent and voluntary guilty plea before that hearing was conducted. Since defendant failed to obtain a final order in connection with his suppression motions, any issue underlying those motions was waived by defendant’s entry of the guilty plea (People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686; CPL 710.70 [2]). [94]*94Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rubin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 245 A.D.2d 93, 665 N.Y.S.2d 875, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 93 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fernandez
490 N.E.2d 838 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)