People v. Perez

279 A.D.2d 291, 718 N.Y.S.2d 835, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 141
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D.2d 403

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered [292]*292February 8, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, 6 to 12 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The prosecutor’s summation was responsive to the defense summation, was fair comment based on the evidence and was within the permissible bounds of rhetorical comment (see, People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133, lv denied 91 NY2d 976; People v D’Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 NY2d 884).

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 279 A.D.2d 291, 718 N.Y.S.2d 835, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

279 A.D.2d 291 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. D'Alessandro
184 A.D.2d 114 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Overlee
236 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)