Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Perez

People v. Perez

256 A.D.2d 523, 682 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13662
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 224 A.D.2d 313 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 21, 1998·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), rendered July 30, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s assertion on appeal, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in rendering its Sandoval ruling (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282; People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not warrant reversal (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 256 A.D.2d 523, 682 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13662 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 523 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)