People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Perez

223 A.D.2d 605, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1022

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D.2d 605 (People v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Perez, 223 A.D.2d 605, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), imposed September 19, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Sullivan, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), imposed September 19, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain. Accordingly, the sentence is affirmed (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Sullivan, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 605, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perez-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack