People v. Pemberton

93 A.D.3d 681, 938 N.Y.S.2d 922
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 2012·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J), imposed March 21, 2011, which, upon his conviction of sodomy in the first degree, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on August 21, 2001.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentence of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Ralph, 91 AD3d 796 [2012]; People v Algarin, 89 AD3d 859 [2011]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Eng, Chambers, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pemberton, 93 A.D.3d 681, 938 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

93 A.D.3d 681 (People v. Pemberton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Aller
109 A.D.3d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Jiggetts
108 A.D.3d 641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Harpe
100 A.D.3d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Jones
94 A.D.3d 1146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)