People v. Algarin
89 A.D.3d 859, 932 N.Y.2d 358
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2011·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Inasmuch as the defendant had not yet completed serving his originally imposed sentences of imprisonment when he was resentenced, his resentencing to a term including the statutorily required periods of postrelease supervision did not violate the double jeopardy and due process clauses of the United States Constitution (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630-632 [2011]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543, 543-544 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 859 [2011]; People v Burgos, 84 AD3d 975 [2011]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Algarin, 89 A.D.3d 859, 932 N.Y.2d 358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 859 (People v. Algarin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Aller
109 A.D.3d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Pemberton
93 A.D.3d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Bailey
92 A.D.3d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Ralph
91 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Mills
90 A.D.3d 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)