People v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jones

92 A.D.3d 696, 937 N.Y.2d 862

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2012

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 A.D.3d 696 (People v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Jones, 92 A.D.3d 696, 937 N.Y.2d 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea on that ground (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]; People v Carr, 89 AD3d 1033 [2011]). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16 [1983]; People v Jones, 183 AD2d 918 [1992]). Angiolillo, J.P, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea on that ground (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 [1995]; People v Carr, 89 AD3d 1033 [2011]). In any event, the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16 [1983]; People v Jones, 183 AD2d 918 [1992]). Angiolillo, J.P, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 A.D.3d 696, 937 N.Y.2d 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jones-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack