People v. Parker

261 A.D.2d 926, 689 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5013
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the suppression court that the police had probable cause to pursue and arrest defendant. An officer received a description of the suspect over the police radio and from the victim (see, People v Sekoll, [927]*927254 AD2d 797); the victim pointed out defendant, who was walking along the street, as the person who robbed him (see, People v Grant, 254 AD2d 700); and defendant fled when the pursuing officer directed him to stop (see, People v Lindsay, 249 AD2d 937, lv denied 92 NY2d 900). The bargained-for sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., Scudder and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Parker, 261 A.D.2d 926, 689 N.Y.S.2d 910, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 926 (People v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Waller
288 A.D.2d 950 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Cox
275 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)