People v. Parker

232 A.D.2d 661, 648 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11366
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Parker. Read the opinion of the Court — 220 A.D.2d 815

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered April 24, 1996, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court on February 24, 1995, upon a finding that he had violated the conditions thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Parker, 232 A.D.2d 661, 648 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11366 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

232 A.D.2d 661 (People v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)