People v. Palmer

107 A.D.3d 869, 967 N.Y.S.2d 651
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Palmer. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 A.D.3d 1414

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), dated June 2, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was clear and convincing evidence to support the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level three sexually violent offender (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Pettigrew, 14 NY3d 406, 408 [2010]; People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]; People v Gilligan, 94 AD3d 844 [2012]). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly determined that he was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128-129 [2011]; People v Santana, 104 AD3d 660 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 854 [2013]). Rivera, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Palmer, 107 A.D.3d 869, 967 N.Y.S.2d 651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

107 A.D.3d 869 (People v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pettigrew
927 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Wyatt
89 A.D.3d 112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Gilligan
94 A.D.3d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Santana
104 A.D.3d 660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)