People v. Santana
This text of 104 A.D.3d 660 (People v. Santana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated March 26, 2012, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court properly determined that he was not entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive risk level. Thus, he was properly designated a level three sex offender (see People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 128-129 [2011]; People v Bowden, 88 AD3d 972, 973 [2011]; People v Mondo, 88 AD3d 676 [2011]; People v Livingston, 87 AD3d 628 [2011]). Rivera, J.E, Hall, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 A.D.3d 660, 960 N.Y.S.2d 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-santana-nyappdiv-2013.