People v. Oglesby

220 A.D.2d 780, 633 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10544

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[781] fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), rendered July 19,1993, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hernandez, 127 AD2d 790; People v Reding, 167 AD2d 716). In any event, any error was harmless (see, People v Hernandez, supra; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

The defendant’s remaining contentions regarding the court’s charge to the jury, and the alleged admission of hearsay testimony, are also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245; People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26; People v Autry, 75 NY2d 836; People v Fleming, 70 NY2d 947; People v Williams, 70 NY2d 946) and, in any event, without merit. Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oglesby, 220 A.D.2d 780, 633 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10544 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

220 A.D.2d 780 (People v. Oglesby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fleming
519 N.E.2d 616 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Williams
519 N.E.2d 615 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Autry
552 N.E.2d 156 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Bonaparte
574 N.E.2d 1027 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)
People v. Hernandez
127 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Reding
167 A.D.2d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)