People v. Oglesby
This text of 220 A.D.2d 780 (People v. Oglesby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the de[781]*781fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), rendered July 19,1993, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contentions regarding the prosecutor’s summation are, in part, unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hernandez, 127 AD2d 790; People v Reding, 167 AD2d 716). In any event, any error was harmless (see, People v Hernandez, supra; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).
The defendant’s remaining contentions regarding the court’s charge to the jury, and the alleged admission of hearsay testimony, are also unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245; People v Bonaparte, 78 NY2d 26; People v Autry, 75 NY2d 836; People v Fleming, 70 NY2d 947; People v Williams, 70 NY2d 946) and, in any event, without merit. Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 A.D.2d 780, 633 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oglesby-nyappdiv-1995.