People v. Williams
This text of 519 N.E.2d 615 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
At trial the prosecution questioned two of defendant’s witnesses regarding why they had not informed the authorities of the information they possessed potentially exculpating the defendant. Defendant’s two central arguments on appeal are that the trial court erred in (1) allowing the prosecution’s questions without the proper foundation under People v Dawson (50 NY2d 311), and (2) failing first to hold a bench *947 conference to assess the propriety of such questioning. No objection was made to the trial court on these grounds, however, and thus the arguments now pressed were not preserved for our review.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Titone taking no part.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
519 N.E.2d 615, 70 N.Y.2d 946, 524 N.Y.S.2d 669, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-ny-1988.