People v. Nixon

213 A.D.2d 1068, 625 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecutor’s misconduct during [1069]*1069examination of witnesses and summation. The majority of the alleged errors have not been preserved for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). "Because those errors that were preserved 'were not so egregious or prejudicial as to deprive defendant of a fair trial, reversal is not warranted’ ” (People v Toumbis, 204 AD2d 1026, quoting People v Dawkins, 203 AD2d 957, 958, lv denied 84 NY2d 824). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J.—Assault, 1st Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nixon, 213 A.D.2d 1068, 625 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 1068 (People v. Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. DePillo
262 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Fontanez
254 A.D.2d 762 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. McAllister
217 A.D.2d 978 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)