People v. Nixon
This text of 240 A.D.2d 764 (People v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered November 13, 1995, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that he was arrested without probable cause is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Feliciano, 185 AD2d 359). In any event, his contention lacks merit since probable cause for an arrest may be based on a victim’s identification of a suspect in a photographic array (see, People v Hayes, 191 AD2d 644).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Thompson, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D.2d 764, 660 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-nixon-nyappdiv-1997.