People v. Fontanez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fontanez

247 A.D.2d 260, 668 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1105

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 10, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 260 (People v. Fontanez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fontanez, 247 A.D.2d 260, 668 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered May 24, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and reliability of testimony (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94).

Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of a severed codefendant, testifying as a defense witness, improperly suggested that the witness had the propensity to commit certain crimes and that the jury may have imputed that propensity to defendant is unpreserved due to lack of specific objection (People v Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879, 881) and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review defendant’s claim, we would find that the witness was properly questioned regarding his criminal history, that defendant’s claim of prejudice rests on speculation (see, People v Evans, 161 AD2d 426), and that any potential prejudice was avoided by the court’s instructions to the jury.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered May 24, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). We see no reason to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and reliability of testimony (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94).

Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor’s cross-examination of a severed codefendant, testifying as a defense witness, improperly suggested that the witness had the propensity to commit certain crimes and that the jury may have imputed that propensity to defendant is unpreserved due to lack of specific objection (People v Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879, 881) and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review defendant’s claim, we would find that the witness was properly questioned regarding his criminal history, that defendant’s claim of prejudice rests on speculation (see, People v Evans, 161 AD2d 426), and that any potential prejudice was avoided by the court’s instructions to the jury.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D.2d 260, 668 N.Y.S.2d 362, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fontanez-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack