People v. Murray

189 A.D.2d 827
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 19, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 A.D.2d 827 (People v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Murray, 189 A.D.2d 827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered June 21, 1990, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant argues that the Supreme Court erred in giving the jury a Dawson charge (see, People v Dawson, 50 NY2d 311, 321), with respect to an alibi witness. However, review of the trial minutes reveals that defense counsel had in fact requested this instruction.

[828]*828We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Lawrence, J. P., Eiber, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Murray
242 A.D.2d 592 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 A.D.2d 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-murray-nyappdiv-1993.