People v. Murray

199 A.D.2d 67, 604 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11759
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Murray. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D.2d 573

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Marks, J., at suppression hearing; Alvin Schlesinger, J., at trial), rendered April 24, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s knowledge that the property was stolen could be inferred, beyond a reasonable doubt, as a result of his recent, exclusive, unexplained possession thereof, as the jury was properly instructed (People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 382-383). The prosecutor’s attempt to argue that defendant [68]*68had probably stolen the property himself did not, in the circumstances, constitute an accusation of an "uncharged crime” but was fair argument (supra). In any event, the court gave a prompt curative instruction to disregard the argument. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Wallach and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Murray, 199 A.D.2d 67, 604 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

199 A.D.2d 67 (People v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baskerville
457 N.E.2d 752 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)