People v. Moton

213 A.D.2d 564, 624 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Moton. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 A.D.2d 781

Opinion

—Appeal by the defen[565]*565dant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), imposed March 8, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the sentence imposed in this case does not reflect a failure to observe the principles of sentencing, is not an improvident exercise of discretion, and is not excessive (see, People v Reyes, 144 AD2d 394; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Moton, 213 A.D.2d 564, 624 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

213 A.D.2d 564 (People v. Moton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Reyes
144 A.D.2d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)