People v. Moton

213 A.D.2d 564, 624 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891

This text of 213 A.D.2d 564 (People v. Moton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Moton, 213 A.D.2d 564, 624 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defen[565]*565dant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), imposed March 8, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the sentence imposed in this case does not reflect a failure to observe the principles of sentencing, is not an improvident exercise of discretion, and is not excessive (see, People v Reyes, 144 AD2d 394; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Reyes
144 A.D.2d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D.2d 564, 624 N.Y.S.2d 920, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-moton-nyappdiv-1995.