People v. Moreno

278 A.D.2d 434, 718 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13209
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Moreno. Read the opinion of the Court — 303 A.D.2d 424

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered June 26, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to object to the Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) and, therefore, his present contention is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Penafiel, 247 AD2d 411). In any event, the defendant’s claim is without merit.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Moreno, 278 A.D.2d 434, 718 N.Y.S.2d 628, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 434 (People v. Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Penafiel
247 A.D.2d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)