People v. Moreno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Moreno

272 A.D.2d 898, 708 N.Y.S.2d 670, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5324

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the suppression court’s determination that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights before speaking to the police, and thus his motion to suppress his statements was properly denied (see, People v Davis, 55 NY2d 731, 733; People v Huntley, 224 AD2d 987, Iv denied 87 NY2d 1020; People v Hill, 175 AD2d 603). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Lament, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Scudder, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record supports the suppression court’s determination that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights before speaking to the police, and thus his motion to suppress his statements was properly denied (see, People v Davis, 55 NY2d 731, 733; People v Huntley, 224 AD2d 987, Iv denied 87 NY2d 1020; People v Hill, 175 AD2d 603). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Lament, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Scudder, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

People v. Moreno, 272 A.D.2d 898, 708 N.Y.S.2d 670, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

272 A.D.2d 898 (People v. Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related