People v. Moreno

273 A.D.2d 257, 709 N.Y.S.2d 835, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6208
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

- — Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), rendered April 17, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the court properly refused to direct the People to disclose the identity of the confidential informant and produce him for questioning. The issue of identification was not a close one and the testimony of the confidential informant would not have been relevant to guilt or innocence (see, People v Pena, 37 NY2d 642; People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, 170; People v Dudley, 69 AD2d 888, 889).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Moreno, 273 A.D.2d 257, 709 N.Y.S.2d 835, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 257 (People v. Moreno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vega
23 A.D.3d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)