People v. Montanus
This text of 90 A.D.2d 992 (People v. Montanus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: When defendant entered a plea of guilty, he forfeited his right to claim that he was deprived of a speedy trial pursuant to CPL 30.30 (People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845). Defendant’s attempt to preserve that issue for review by obtaining the consent of the District Attorney and the approval of the court is of no avail (see People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Howe, 56 NY2d 622). Our determination, however, is without prejudice to a postjudgment application by defendant, if he be so advised, challenging the knowing nature of his guilty plea (see People v O’Brien, 84 AD2d 567, 568, affd 56 NY2d 1009, supra). (Appeal from judgment of Jefferson County Court, Aylward, J. — driving while intoxicated.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.2d 992, 456 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-montanus-nyappdiv-1982.