In re Christopher F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Christopher F.

126 A.D.2d 975, 511 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42095

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 23, 1987·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Respondent forfeited any claim regarding a deprivation of the statutory right to a speedy trial (Family Ct Act §§ 310.2, 340.1) when he entered a plea of guilty (cf. People v O'Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845, 847). This determination is without prejudice, however, to a postjudgment application by respondent, if he be so advised, challenging the knowing nature of his guilty plea (see, People v Montanus, 90 AD2d 992). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.—juvenile delinquency.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Respondent forfeited any claim regarding a deprivation of the statutory right to a speedy trial (Family Ct Act §§ 310.2, 340.1) when he entered a plea of guilty (cf. People v O'Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010; People v Suarez, 55 NY2d 940; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845, 847). This determination is without prejudice, however, to a postjudgment application by respondent, if he be so advised, challenging the knowing nature of his guilty plea (see, People v Montanus, 90 AD2d 992). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court, Sedita, J.—juvenile delinquency.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.

In re Christopher F., 126 A.D.2d 975, 511 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

126 A.D.2d 975 (In re Christopher F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related