People v. Mojica

278 A.D.2d 343, 718 N.Y.S.2d 601, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mojica. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D.2d 591

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered June 19, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record, including the defendant’s supplemental pro se brief, and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mojica, 278 A.D.2d 343, 718 N.Y.S.2d 601, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 343 (People v. Mojica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)