People v. Mojica

276 A.D.2d 721, 715 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10712
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Mojica. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D.2d 591

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered March 11, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Any error regarding the People’s failure to give notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230; People v Evans, 256 AD2d 520; People v Bradshaw, 232 AD2d 499).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mojica, 276 A.D.2d 721, 715 N.Y.S.2d 857, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 721 (People v. Mojica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Bradshaw
232 A.D.2d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Evans
256 A.D.2d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)