People v. Mojica

267 A.D.2d 19, 699 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12400
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Silverman, J.), rendered October 10, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, and judgment, same court (Edward Davidowitz, J.), rendered October 20, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a concurrent term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s motion to suppress was properly denied. Probable cause was established by radioed descriptions of defendant that were sufficiently specific given the very close temporal and spatial proximity of defendant to the drug sale and the absence of anyone else meeting the descriptions in the vicinity (see, People v Sandoval, 253 AD2d 727, lv denied 92 NY2d 1037). In any event, defendant’s struggle with an officer provided probable cause independently for defendant’s arrest (see, People v Townes, 41 NY2d 97). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Mojica, 267 A.D.2d 19, 699 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12400 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 19 (People v. Mojica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lineberger
282 A.D.2d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)