People v. Miller

259 A.D.2d 1037, 689 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3456
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1], [4]). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), is legally sufficient to disprove defendant’s defense of temporary and lawful possession of a weapon (see, People v Rodriguez, 237 AD2d 143, lv denied 89 NY2d 1099). The record supports the jury’s determination that defendant did not have a legal excuse for having the weapon in his possession (see, People v Banks, 76 NY2d 799, 801; People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043, 1045). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.— Criminal Possession Weapon, 3rd Degree.) Present — Lawton, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 259 A.D.2d 1037, 689 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3456 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

259 A.D.2d 1037 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BAILEY, II, AUBREY D., PEOPLE v
111 A.D.3d 1310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Lucas
94 A.D.3d 1441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)