People v. Miller

234 A.D.2d 804, 652 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12596
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.), rendered October 13, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Defendant pleaded guilty to operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, a felony, in satisfaction of an indictment charging two counts of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol as well as an outstanding ticket. As part of the plea agreement, the People agreed to recommend a sentence of five years’ probation, revocation of defendant’s driving privileges and the imposition of a fine, and also reserved the right to request a six-month jail term depending on the contents of the presentence report.

While awaiting sentencing, defendant was arrested for and pleaded guilty to aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle. In light of these interim events, County Court refused to accede to the agreed-upon sentence. Although the court afforded defendant the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea, defendant declined to do so. Defendant was then sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 4 years, his driving privileges were revoked and a fine imposed.

Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that this sentence is harsh and excessive. Specifically, defendant argues that a six-month jail term and five years’ probation is a more appropriate sentence. Upon our review of the record, we disagree. In light of defendant’s prior driving while intoxicated conviction and, in particular, his interim aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle conviction, we cannot conclude that a reduction of the sentence is warranted in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Mackey, 136 AD2d 780, 781, lv denied 71 NY2d 899).

Mikoll, J. P., Casey, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Miller, 234 A.D.2d 804, 652 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 804 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hamm
249 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Empey
242 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Battiste
238 A.D.2d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)