People v. Miller
227 A.D.2d 975, 643 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6927
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reserved decision and remitted this matter to County Court to make findings of fact and a determination whether defendant was present at an in-chambers Sandoval hearing (People v Miller, 221 AD2d 1001). The testimony at the reconstruction hearing supports the court’s finding that defendant was present at the hearing. (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Murad, J. — Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Miller, 227 A.D.2d 975, 643 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
227 A.D.2d 975 (People v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Childs
247 A.D.2d 319 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)