People v. McKinney

91 A.D.3d 1300, 937 N.Y.2d 507
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 91 A.D.3d 1300 (People v. McKinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McKinney, 91 A.D.3d 1300, 937 N.Y.2d 507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by reducing the conviction of leaving the scene of a personal injury incident without reporting as a class D felony under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 (2) to leaving the scene of a personal injury incident without reporting as a class E felony and by vacating the sentence imposed on count one of the indictment and imposing a sentence of lVs to 4 years on that count and as modified the judgment is affirmed in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her following a jury trial of, inter alia, leaving the scene of a personal injury incident as a class D felony (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 600 [2] [a]). As defendant contends, and the People correctly conceded at oral argument of this appeal, the indictment as filed charged defendant with only a class E felony under section 600 (2) (a), for having caused “serious physical injury” to the victim, and thus Supreme Court erred in granting the People’s oral motion at trial to amend the indictment to allege that the victim died, thereby raising the offense to a class D felony (see § 600 [2] [c]). Because the People proved at trial beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant left the scene of a personal injury incident that resulted in serious physical injury to another person, we modify the judgment by reducing the conviction from a class D felony to a class E felony. Inasmuch as defendant has already served the maximum term of imprisonment permitted for the class E felony, there is no need to remit the matter to Supreme Court for resentencing on count one (see People v Jackson, 269 AD2d 867 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 798 [2000]). Rather, in the interest of judicial economy, we instead further modify the judgment by vacating the [1301]*1301sentence imposed on count one and by imposing the maximum allowed for a class E felony, i.e., an indeterminate term of imprisonment of lVs to 4 years. Present — Smith, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hensley
2024 NY Slip Op 02650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Santiago
2021 NY Slip Op 03756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Crittenden
2020 NY Slip Op 06901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
CLARK, DONALD, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Clark
138 A.D.3d 1449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Malcolm
131 A.D.3d 1068 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
BAUSANO, RICHARD, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Bausano
122 A.D.3d 1341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 1300, 937 N.Y.2d 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mckinney-nyappdiv-2012.