People v. McKinney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McKinney

66 A.D.3d 922, 886 N.Y.S.2d 627

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McKinney. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 A.D.3d 1300 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 20, 2009·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered May 16, 2008, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s [923]*923assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered May 16, 2008, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s [923]*923assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

People v. McKinney, 66 A.D.3d 922, 886 N.Y.S.2d 627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

66 A.D.3d 922 (People v. McKinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related