People v. McIntosh

300 N.W.2d 584, 101 Mich. App. 422, 1980 Mich. App. LEXIS 3047
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided November 5, 1980·No. Docket 47083·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to armed robbery and felony firearm, contrary to MCL 750.529; MSA 28.797 and MCL 750.227b; MSA 28.424(2).

On appeal defendant asks this Court to remand his case back to the circuit court for resentencing because defendant was not present in the judge’s chambers at a presentencing conference. People v Briggs, 94 Mich App 723; 290 NW2d 66 (1980), and People v Worden, 91 Mich App 666; 284 NW2d 159 (1979), hold contrary to defendant’s position.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McIntosh, 300 N.W.2d 584, 101 Mich. App. 422, 1980 Mich. App. LEXIS 3047 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980).

300 N.W.2d 584 (People v. McIntosh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Matzat
310 N.W.2d 231 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Bellafant
307 N.W.2d 422 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Gasco
305 N.W.2d 552 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. McIntosh
300 N.W.2d 584 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1980)