People v. McCoy

273 A.D.2d 480, 711 N.Y.S.2d 740
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. McCoy. Read the opinion of the Court — 266 A.D.2d 589

Opinion

Appeal by the de[481]*481fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered July 15, 1997, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and criminal contempt in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People failed to prove that he entered the premises with the intent to commit the crime of criminal contempt therein is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hodges, 257 AD2d 630; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. McCoy, 273 A.D.2d 480, 711 N.Y.S.2d 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 480 (People v. McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Hodges
257 A.D.2d 630 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)