People v. McCoy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. McCoy

301 A.D.2d 455, 753 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 389

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 23, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 301 A.D.2d 455 (People v. McCoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. McCoy, 301 A.D.2d 455, 753 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 389 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered April 4, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment. Defendant failed to successfully complete several drug treatment programs due to his poor attendance and positive tests for drugs, and was arrested on a new charge shortly after being placed on interim supervision (see People v Reshard, 293 AD2d 290, lv denied 98 NY2d 680). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee White, J.), rendered April 4, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment. Defendant failed to successfully complete several drug treatment programs due to his poor attendance and positive tests for drugs, and was arrested on a new charge shortly after being placed on interim supervision (see People v Reshard, 293 AD2d 290, lv denied 98 NY2d 680). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 A.D.2d 455, 753 N.Y.S.2d 365, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mccoy-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack