People v. Marks

172 A.D.2d 1069
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 26, 1991
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 172 A.D.2d 1069 (People v. Marks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Marks, 172 A.D.2d 1069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant did not preserve for review his contention that his convictions under indictment No. 89-1415 must be reversed (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666; People v Bouges, 129 AD2d 967). Moreover, defendant waived his right to appeal this issue as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 7, 10). In any event, the record establishes that defendant did in fact knowingly and voluntarily plead guilty to each count of the indictment. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Marks
172 A.D.2d 1069 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D.2d 1069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-marks-nyappdiv-1991.