People v. Marks

172 A.D.2d 1069
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 1991·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant did not preserve for review his contention that his convictions under indictment No. 89-1415 must be reversed (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666; People v Bouges, 129 AD2d 967). Moreover, defendant waived his right to appeal this issue as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 7, 10). In any event, the record establishes that defendant did in fact knowingly and voluntarily plead guilty to each count of the indictment. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Marks, 172 A.D.2d 1069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

172 A.D.2d 1069 (People v. Marks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Marks
172 A.D.2d 1069 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)