People v. Marks

167 A.D.2d 974, 563 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14590

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: November 16, 1990
• Status: Published

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: The People concede that reversal is required because the deliberating jury was not "continuously kept together under the supervision of a court officer” (CPL 310.10; People v Coons, 75 NY2d 796). Failure to sequester the jury during deliberations is an error which " 'affect[s] the organization of the court or the mode of proceedings prescribed by law’ ” (People v Ahmed, 66 NY2d 307, 310, quoting People v Patterson, 39 NY2d 288, 295, affd 432 US 197). Although the parties agreed to let the jurors go home for the evening, failure to sequester the jury during deliberations is a fundamental error depriving defendant of a fair trial. "[T]he right protected by CPL 310.10 is of such fundamental importance that defendant can neither waive it nor consent to waive it, violation of such right is per se reversible” (People v Dasher, 161 AD2d 1207, 1208). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.— assault, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Lawton, JJ.