People v. Dasher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Dasher

161 A.D.2d 1207, 556 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9276

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 161 A.D.2d 1207 (People v. Dasher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Dasher, 161 A.D.2d 1207, 556 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: It was error for the court to fail to sequester the jury during [1208]*1208deliberations as required by CPL 310.10 (People v Coons, 75 NY2d 796; People v Smith, 161 AD2d 1160 [decided herewith]). The procedural error claimed here has been classified as among those " 'that would affect the organization of the court or the mode of proceedings prescribed by law’ ” (People v Ahmed, 66 NY2d 307, 310, rearg denied 67 NY2d 647, quoting People v Patterson, 39 NY2d 288, 295, affd 432 US 197). Since the right protected by CPL 310.10 is of such fundamental importance that defendant can neither waive it nor consent to it, violation of such right is per se reversible. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: It was error for the court to fail to sequester the jury during [1208]*1208deliberations as required by CPL 310.10 (People v Coons, 75 NY2d 796; People v Smith, 161 AD2d 1160 [decided herewith]). The procedural error claimed here has been classified as among those " 'that would affect the organization of the court or the mode of proceedings prescribed by law’ ” (People v Ahmed, 66 NY2d 307, 310, rearg denied 67 NY2d 647, quoting People v Patterson, 39 NY2d 288, 295, affd 432 US 197). Since the right protected by CPL 310.10 is of such fundamental importance that defendant can neither waive it nor consent to it, violation of such right is per se reversible. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 A.D.2d 1207, 556 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dasher-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack