People v. Smith
This text of 157 A.D.2d 810 (People v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Appelman, J.), rendered October 20, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Our review of the record establishes that the identification testimony adduced at trial was sufficient as a matter of law to sustain the defendant’s conviction (People v Cook, 99 AD2d 552, 553). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Finally, we decline to reduce the defendant’s sentence in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, People v [811]*811Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 A.D.2d 810, 551 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smith-nyappdiv-1990.