People v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lynch

4 A.D.3d 809, 771 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1476

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 4 A.D.3d 809 (People v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lynch, 4 A.D.3d 809, 771 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered November 26, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of forgery in the second degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal entered as part of the plea agreement was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]; People v Summers [appeal No. 2], 242 AD2d 869 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 881 [1997]). “The record establishes that defendant understood that, by waiving his right to appeal, he was relinquishing the right to challenge his conviction” (Summers, 242 AD2d at 869). Defendant’s general waiver of the right to appeal encompasses County Court’s suppression ruling (see People v Taber, 303 AD2d 1027 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 599 [2003]; People v Davidson, 298 AD2d 854, 855 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 557 [2002]). Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D’Amico, J.), rendered November 26, 2001. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of forgery in the second degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, his waiver of the right to appeal entered as part of the plea agreement was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]; People v Summers [appeal No. 2], 242 AD2d 869 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 881 [1997]). “The record establishes that defendant understood that, by waiving his right to appeal, he was relinquishing the right to challenge his conviction” (Summers, 242 AD2d at 869). Defendant’s general waiver of the right to appeal encompasses County Court’s suppression ruling (see People v Taber, 303 AD2d 1027 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 599 [2003]; People v Davidson, 298 AD2d 854, 855 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 557 [2002]). Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 809, 771 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lynch-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack