People v. Taber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Taber

303 A.D.2d 1027, 756 N.Y.S.2d 814, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 1027 (People v. Taber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Taber, 303 A.D.2d 1027, 756 N.Y.S.2d 814, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Wyoming County Court (Dadd, J.), entered June 14, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) for the bludgeoning death of an acquaintance committed in furtherance of a robbery. In consideration of his plea of guilty, defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 19 years to life. Defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was not voluntarily made and that his conviction should be reversed on the ground that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion. We conclude, however, that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal and “[t]hat waiver precludes our review of the denial of defendant’s suppression motion” (People v Meeks, 270 AD2d 859, 859 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 837 [2000]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of Wyoming County Court (Dadd, J.), entered June 14, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of murder in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]) for the bludgeoning death of an acquaintance committed in furtherance of a robbery. In consideration of his plea of guilty, defendant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 19 years to life. Defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was not voluntarily made and that his conviction should be reversed on the ground that County Court erred in denying his suppression motion. We conclude, however, that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal and “[t]hat waiver precludes our review of the denial of defendant’s suppression motion” (People v Meeks, 270 AD2d 859, 859 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 837 [2000]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 1027, 756 N.Y.S.2d 814, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-taber-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack