People v. Lugo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lugo

170 A.D.2d 376, 566 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2314

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D.2d 376 (People v. Lugo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lugo, 170 A.D.2d 376, 566 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered June 10, 1988, convicting defendant after a jury trial of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the second degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of from 2 Vi to 5 years and from lVi to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The issue of whether the prosecutor’s remarks and summation deprived defendant of a fair trial has not been preserved for appellate review for the reason that no specific objection was taken at trial (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions [377]*377and find them to be both unpreserved and without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered June 10, 1988, convicting defendant after a jury trial of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the second degree and sentencing him, as a predicate felon, to concurrent indeterminate prison terms of from 2 Vi to 5 years and from lVi to 3 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The issue of whether the prosecutor’s remarks and summation deprived defendant of a fair trial has not been preserved for appellate review for the reason that no specific objection was taken at trial (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions [377]*377and find them to be both unpreserved and without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D.2d 376, 566 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lugo-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack