People v. Thompson

224 A.D.2d 646, 639 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1358
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 20, 1996·Published·Cited by 22 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flaherty, J.), rendered May 5, 1994, convicting him of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find unpersuasive the defendant’s contention that the prosecution failed to prove him guilty of assault in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Specifically, the People presented legally sufficient evidence to prove that the complainant suffered a "serious physical injury” in that the injury "create[d] a substantial risk of death” (Penal Law [647]*647§ 10.00 [10]). The proof submitted by the prosecution, including the extensive medical records of the complainant’s hospitalization following the stabbing, demonstrated that the wound to the complainant’s upper chest area caused the complainant to experience labored breathing and substantial bleeding. Furthermore, the wound inflicted by the defendant caused the complainant to suffer a pneumothorax, which resulted in a collapsed lung and necessitated the insertion of a tube into the complainant’s chest. Accordingly, the medical evidence was legally sufficient to establish that the complainant suffered a serious physical injury as a result of the stabbing by the defendant (see, People v Wright, 105 AD2d 1088) and, contrary to the defendant’s contention, there was no requirement that the People present expert medical testimony in addition to the other evidence adduced. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Thompson, 224 A.D.2d 646, 639 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 646 (People v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santana v. N/A Warden
E.D. New York, 2023
People v. Gutierrez
209 A.D.3d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Fuentes
2020 NY Slip Op 4180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Marc McCoy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
Kentucky Supreme Court, 2018
McCoy v. Commonwealth
553 S.W.3d 816 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)
Brown v. Commonwealth
553 S.W.3d 826 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)
People v. Lopez-Miralles
2017 NY Slip Op 6377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
BARBUTO, JOEL S., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Barbuto
126 A.D.3d 1501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Santone v. Fischer
689 F.3d 138 (Second Circuit, 2012)
People v. Brown
67 A.D.3d 1427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Guillen
65 A.D.3d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Howard v. McGinnis
632 F. Supp. 2d 253 (W.D. New York, 2009)
People v. Kearney
24 A.D.3d 1105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Shongo
288 A.D.2d 920 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re Eleda
280 A.D.2d 405 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Fullard
233 A.D.2d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)