People v. Lopez

297 A.D.2d 561, 747 N.Y.2d 156, 747 N.Y.S.2d 156, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8443
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 19, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). There is no basis upon which [562]*562to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning identification and credibility. The undercover officer made a reliable identification of defendant, particularly since he had ample opportunities to observe defendant during two transactions in the course of an investigation.

The court properly denied defendant’s request to submit a lesser included offense since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, to support such a charge. The scientific evidence positively and consistently established that the weight of the drugs was well in excess of the statutory threshold for criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (see People v Butler, 248 AD2d 274, Iv denied 91 NY2d 1005). Concur — Wallach, J.P., Lerner, Rubin, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 297 A.D.2d 561, 747 N.Y.2d 156, 747 N.Y.S.2d 156, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

297 A.D.2d 561 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
66 A.D.2d 537 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)