People v. Lopez

271 A.D.2d 699, 708 N.Y.S.2d 299, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4467
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McCann, J.), rendered December 15, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant has failed to provide a sufficient record with respect to his claim that he was deprived of his right to a speedy trial (see, People v Hannigan, 193 AD2d 8; People v Olivo, 52 NY2d 309).

There was probable cause to arrest the defendant (see, CPL 140.10; People v Amoateng, 141 AD2d 398).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lopez, 271 A.D.2d 699, 708 N.Y.S.2d 299, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

271 A.D.2d 699 (People v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
286 A.D.2d 781 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)